Question

第六部分   书面表达（满分20分）

北京大学2010年将试行由中学校长实名推荐的招生改革。被推荐的学生高考成绩可获得30分的加分。2009年11月16日北大公布了39所有推荐资格的中学名单。北大这一举措在全国引起了一场激烈的争论。请根据以下要点给《中国日报》写一篇有关这场争论的报导，并表达你对这场争论的看法（至少两点）。

支持方意见	反对方意见
是改革当前高考制度的大胆尝试。 能确保高素质学生和有特殊才华学生进入一流大学。 促进中学重视学生的全面发展。	可能导致作假。 对全国那么多中学不公平。 给被推荐的学生加分没意义。
你的看法：1. ……                        2. ……

注意：    1．对所给要点逐一陈述，适当发挥，不要简单翻译。

2．词数100字左右。开头已经写好，不计入总词数。

3．参考词汇：（1）大胆的  bold  （2）透明的 transparent 

Peking University will enroll students recommended by high school principals next year. The recommended students will have an extra 30 points added to their national college entrance exam scores. Peking University’s move has set off a nationwide debate.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Answer 1

One possible version:

Peking University will enroll students recommended by high school principals this year. The recommended students will have an extra 30 points added to their national college entrance exam scores. Peking University’s move has set off a nationwide debate.

Some people approve of this move. They think this is the bold attempt Peking University has made at reforming the current university entrance system. This move provides quality students and students talented in certain subjects with an opportunity to enter first-class universities and ensure that they aren’t overlooked simply because of their performance in the national university entrance exam. Meanwhile, it will push high schools to pay more attention to the students’ all-round development.

However, quite a few people object to the move. Firstly, it may lead to cheating. Secondly, only 39 schools are qualified to recommend students, which is unfair to so many schools across the country. Thirdly, there is no point giving extra scores to those recommended students, for they are mostly top students and have no problem entering Peking University.

As far as I’m concerned, I’m in favor of this reform. As the process of recommendation is transparent, cheating is impossible. Besides, we should support new reforms even if they are not mature.                                                                                                           Yours

Li Ming