下列各句中，标点符号使用不正确的一句是

1. A.
   梅尔·吉布森在意大利拍摄的电影《THE PASSION OF THE CHRIST》（《中国新闻周刊》评论文章译为《耶稣受难记》），2月25在美国上映后引起轰动。
2. B.
   进学校饭厅先得排队，我到苏联新学的第一句话就是：“哪位排在最后？”教研室主任博洛京娜对我说：“您现在就像瞿秋白当年那样，经历《饿乡纪程》。”
3. C.
   2004年4月16日，三亚市政府成立了“三湾”（三亚湾、大小东海湾、亚龙湾）大整治领导小组，对“三湾”进行全面清理整治，恢复沙滩、海域原状，可收效甚微。
4. D.
   她打扫卫生不认真，对待孩子不耐心，买菜报花账，好吃懒做，等等……真让人忍无可忍！

下列句子中加粗的词语释义有误的一项是

1. A.

   英国人对于内阁成员，称作“The Right Honourable”，不是恭维他是最高贵的，而是恭维他是最荣誉的。

   （为讨好而赞扬）

2. B.

   于是学生懔然于荣誉的观念，不敢作弊。

   （严肃认真、小心谨慎的样子。这里指以严肃戒慎的态度对待。）

3. C.

   譬如一个家庭，凡是家庭的各分子，都要努力保持一家的“家风”或“家声”，不能做有辱门楣的事。

   （门框）

4. D.

   为了荣誉问题而实行决斗，也是常见的事。

   （过去欧洲流行的一种风俗，两人发生争端，各不相让，约定时间地点，并邀请证人，彼此用武器对打。泛指进行你死我活的斗争。）

Every pet owner loves his pet. There is no argument here.

　　But when we asked our readers whether they would clone their beloved animals, the responses were split almost down the middle. Of the 228 readers who answered it, 108 would clone, 111 would not and nine weighed each side without offering an opinion.

　　Clearly, from readers’ response, this is an issue that reaches deeply into both the joy and eventual sadness of owning a pet. It speaks, as well, to people’s widely differing expectations over the developing scientific procedure.

　　Most of the respondents who favored the idea strongly believed it would produce at least a close copy of the original; many felt the process would actually return an exact copy. Those on the other side, however, held little hope a clone could never truly recreate a pet, many simply didn’t wish to go against the natural law of life and death.

　　Both sides expressed equal love for their animals. More than a few respondents owned “the best dog/cat in the world”. They thought of their pets as their “best friend”, “a member of the family,” “the light of my life.” They told moving stories of pets’ heroism, intelligence and selfless devotion.

　　Little wonders the loss is so disturbing—and the cloning so attractive. “People become very close to their animals, and the loss can be just as hard to bear as when a friend or family member dies,” says Gary Kowalski, author of Goodbye, Friend: Healing Wisdom for Anyone Who Has Ever Lost a Pet. “For me, cloning feels like an attempt to turn death away…It’s understandable. Death is always painful. It’s difficult to deal with. It’s hard to accept.”

 　But would cloning reduce the blow? This question seemed to be at the heart of this problem.

So far as the cloning of pets is concerned, a recent survey shows that, of all pet owners, __________.

A. a lot more of them are for it

B. a lot more of them are against it

C. very few of them are willing to tell their opinions

D. about half of them are for it and the other half against it

While talking about the respondents from the readers, the expression “eventual sadness of owning a pet” refers to _________.

A. the death of one’s pet

B. the high cost of owning a pet

C. the troubles one has to deal with in keeping a pet

D. the dangers involved in the cloning of a pet

In spite of their differences on the problem of cloning, it seems that ________.

A. all pet owners try to go against the natural law of life and death

B. all pet owners love their pets very much

C. people who support cloning love their pets more

D. people who dislike cloning love their pets more

From what Gary Kowalski says, we can know that he _________.

A. has never thought about the problem of cloning

B. is going to write another book on pets

C. is in favor of the idea of cloning pets

D. is all against the cloning of pets

What is the key question at the heart of the problem of cloning pets?

A. Can pet owners afford the cost of cloning?

B. Can cloning make the pain one suffers less when a pet dies?

C. Does cloning go against the law of nature?

D. How reliably does cloning produce an exact copy of one’s pet?