186] It’s impossible for all the people to get jobs because of them are not fit for them. [译文] 不可能所有的人都能得到工作.因为并非所有的人都适合这些工作. A. none B. all C. not all D. every one [答案及简析] B. not与all连用.表示部分否定.表示"并非所有的--都--".D项中every one与not连用也可表示部分否定.但谓语动词要用单数.故不对. 查看更多

 

题目列表(包括答案和解析)


The day after news broke of a possible revolution in physics ——particles (粒子) moving faster than light ?a scientist leading the European experiment that made the discovery calmly explained it to a standing-room- only crowd at CERN.
The physicist, Dario Auterio, did not try to explain what the results might mean for the laws of physics, let alone the broader world.After an hour of technical talk, he simply said, "Therefore, we present to you today this difference, this unusualness."
But what unusualness it may be.From 2009 through 2011, the massive OPERA detector (探测器)buried in a mountain in Gran Sasso, Italy, recorded subatomic particles called neutrinos ( 中微子) arriving faster than light can move in an empty space.The neutrinos generated at CERN are hardly detectably early.If confirmed, the finding would throw more than a century of physics into disorder.
"If it's correct, it's phenomenal." said Rob Plunkett, a scientist at Fermilab, the Department of Energy physics laboratory in Illinois."We'd be looking at a whole new set of rules" for how the universe works.Those rules would bend, or possibly break, Albert Einstein's special theory of relativity, published in 1905.Basical at the time, the theory tied together space and time, matter and energy, and set a hard limit for the speed of light, later measured to be about 186, 000 miles per second.
No experiment in 106 years had broken that speed limit.Physicists expect strict study to follow, which OPERA and CERN scientists welcomed.
Fermilab operates a similar experiment, called MINOS, that shoots neutrinos from Illinois to an underground detector in Minnesota.In 2007, MINOS discovered a just detectable amount of faster than-light neutrinos, but the permissible difference of error was too big to "mention" , Plunkett said.
Fermilab scientists will reanalyze their data, which will take six to eight months.In 2013, the MINOS detector, now offline, will restart after an upgrade.It could then offer confirmation of the results.
【小题1】Why are the European scientists not sure about the results of the experiment?

A.Because they are so unexpected.
B.Because the scientists do not believe them.
C.Because the scientists are careful and calm.
D.Because they are against the present law of physics.
【小题2】The underlined word " phenomenal" in the fourth paragraph has the closest meaning to          .
A.amazingB.attractiveC.embarrassingD.sensitive
【小题3】The best title for the passage may be _____.
A.Are the laws of physics in disorder?
B.Particles faster than light; Revolution or mistake?
C.Faster than light measurement: right or wrong?
D.Is Einstein's theory still right today?
【小题4】What may be discussed in the paragraphs to follow?
A.Different opinions about the experiment.
B.How Albert Einstein's theory developed.
C.The new rules for how the universe works.
D.How Fermilab scientists will reanalyze their data.

查看答案和解析>>

The day after news broke of a possible revolution in physics ——particles (粒子) moving faster than light ?a scientist leading the European experiment that made the discovery calmly explained it to a standing-room- only crowd at CERN.

The physicist, Dario Auterio, did not try to explain what the results might mean for the laws of physics, let alone the broader world.After an hour of technical talk, he simply said, "Therefore, we present to you today this difference, this unusualness."

But what unusualness it may be.From 2009 through 2011, the massive OPERA detector (探测器)buried in a mountain in Gran Sasso, Italy, recorded subatomic particles called neutrinos ( 中微子) arriving faster than light can move in an empty space.The neutrinos generated at CERN are hardly detectably early.If confirmed, the finding would throw more than a century of physics into disorder.

"If it's correct, it's phenomenal." said Rob Plunkett, a scientist at Fermilab, the Department of Energy physics laboratory in Illinois."We'd be looking at a whole new set of rules" for how the universe works.Those rules would bend, or possibly break, Albert Einstein's special theory of relativity, published in 1905.Basical at the time, the theory tied together space and time, matter and energy, and set a hard limit for the speed of light, later measured to be about 186, 000 miles per second.

No experiment in 106 years had broken that speed limit.Physicists expect strict study to follow, which OPERA and CERN scientists welcomed.

Fermilab operates a similar experiment, called MINOS, that shoots neutrinos from Illinois to an underground detector in Minnesota.In 2007, MINOS discovered a just detectable amount of faster than-light neutrinos, but the permissible difference of error was too big to "mention" , Plunkett said.

Fermilab scientists will reanalyze their data, which will take six to eight months.In 2013, the MINOS detector, now offline, will restart after an upgrade.It could then offer confirmation of the results.

72.Why are the European scientists not sure about the results of the experiment?

       A.Because they are so unexpected.

       B.Because the scientists do not believe them.

       C.Because the scientists are careful and calm.

       D.Because they are against the present law of physics.

73.The underlined word " phenomenal" in the fourth paragraph has the closest meaning to           .

       A.amazing           B.attractive           C.embarrassing        D.sensitive

74.The best title for the passage may be _____.

       A.Are the laws of physics in disorder?

       B.Particles faster than light; Revolution or mistake?

       C.Faster than light measurement: right or wrong?

       D.Is Einstein's theory still right today?

75.What may be discussed in the paragraphs to follow?

       A.Different opinions about the experiment.

       B.How Albert Einstein's theory developed.

       C.The new rules for how the universe works.

       D.How Fermilab scientists will reanalyze their data.

查看答案和解析>>

阅读理解,阅读下列短文,从每题所给的四个选项(A、B、C和D)中,选出最佳选项。

  The day after news broke of a possible revolution in physics——particles(粒子)moving faster than light? a scientist leading the European experiment that made the discovery calmly explained it to a standing-room-only crowd at CERN.

  The physicist, Dario Auterio, did not try to explain what the results might mean for the laws of physics, let alone the broader world.After an hour of technical talk, he simply said, "Therefore, we present to you today this difference, this unusualness."

  But what unusualness it may be.From 2009 through 2011, the massive OPERA detector(探测器)buried in a mountain in Gran Sasso, Italy, recorded subatomic particles called neutrinos(中微子)arriving faster than light can move in an empty space.The neutrinos generated at CERN are hardly detectably early.If confirmed, the finding would throw more than a century of physics into disorder.

  "If it's correct, it's phenomenal." said Rob Plunkett, a scientist at Fermilab, the Department of Energy physics laboratory in Illinois."We'd be looking at a whole new set of rules" for how the universe works.Those rules would bend, or possibly break, Albert Einstein's special theory of relativity, published in 1905.Basical at the time, the theory tied together space and time, matter and energy, and set a hard limit for the speed of light, later measured to be about 186, 000 miles per second.

  No experiment in 106 years had broken that speed limit.Physicists expect strict study to follow, which OPERA and CERN scientists welcomed.

  Fermilab operates a similar experiment, called MINOS, that shoots neutrinos from Illinois to an underground detector in Minnesota.In 2007, MINOS discovered a just detectable amount of faster than-light neutrinos, but the permissible difference of error was too big to "mention", Plunkett said.

  Fermilab scientists will reanalyze their data, which will take six to eight months.In 2013, the MINOS detector, now offline, will restart after an upgrade.It could then offer confirmation of the results.

(1)

Why are the European scientists not sure about the results of the experiment?

[  ]

A.

Because they are so unexpected.

B.

Because the scientists do not believe them.

C.

Because the scientists are careful and calm.

D.

Because they are against the present law of physics.

(2)

The underlined word " phenomenal" in the fourth paragraph has the closest meaning to ________.

[  ]

A.

amazing

B.

attractive

C.

embarrassing

D.

sensitive

(3)

The best title for the passage may be ________.

[  ]

A.

Are the laws of physics in disorder?

B.

Particles faster than light; Revolution or mistake?

C.

Faster than light measurement: right or wrong?

D.

Is Einstein's theory still right today?

(4)

What may be discussed in the paragraphs to follow?

[  ]

A.

Different opinions about the experiment.

B.

How Albert Einstein's theory developed.

C.

The new rules for how the universe works.

D.

How Fermilab scientists will reanalyze their data.

查看答案和解析>>

The day after news broke of a possible revolution in physics ——particles (粒子) moving faster than light ?a scientist leading the European experiment that made the discovery calmly explained it to a standing-room- only crowd at CERN.
The physicist, Dario Auterio, did not try to explain what the results might mean for the laws of physics, let alone the broader world.After an hour of technical talk, he simply said, "Therefore, we present to you today this difference, this unusualness."
But what unusualness it may be.From 2009 through 2011, the massive OPERA detector (探测器)buried in a mountain in Gran Sasso, Italy, recorded subatomic particles called neutrinos ( 中微子) arriving faster than light can move in an empty space.The neutrinos generated at CERN are hardly detectably early.If confirmed, the finding would throw more than a century of physics into disorder.
"If it's correct, it's phenomenal." said Rob Plunkett, a scientist at Fermilab, the Department of Energy physics laboratory in Illinois."We'd be looking at a whole new set of rules" for how the universe works.Those rules would bend, or possibly break, Albert Einstein's special theory of relativity, published in 1905.Basical at the time, the theory tied together space and time, matter and energy, and set a hard limit for the speed of light, later measured to be about 186, 000 miles per second.
No experiment in 106 years had broken that speed limit.Physicists expect strict study to follow, which OPERA and CERN scientists welcomed.
Fermilab operates a similar experiment, called MINOS, that shoots neutrinos from Illinois to an underground detector in Minnesota.In 2007, MINOS discovered a just detectable amount of faster than-light neutrinos, but the permissible difference of error was too big to "mention" , Plunkett said.
Fermilab scientists will reanalyze their data, which will take six to eight months.In 2013, the MINOS detector, now offline, will restart after an upgrade.It could then offer confirmation of the results.

  1. 1.

    Why are the European scientists not sure about the results of the experiment?

    1. A.
      Because they are so unexpected.
    2. B.
      Because the scientists do not believe them.
    3. C.
      Because the scientists are careful and calm.
    4. D.
      Because they are against the present law of physics.
  2. 2.

    The underlined word " phenomenal" in the fourth paragraph has the closest meaning to          .

    1. A.
      amazing
    2. B.
      attractive
    3. C.
      embarrassing
    4. D.
      sensitive
  3. 3.

    The best title for the passage may be _____.

    1. A.
      Are the laws of physics in disorder?
    2. B.
      Particles faster than light; Revolution or mistake?
    3. C.
      Faster than light measurement: right or wrong?
    4. D.
      Is Einstein's theory still right today?
  4. 4.

    What may be discussed in the paragraphs to follow?

    1. A.
      Different opinions about the experiment.
    2. B.
      How Albert Einstein's theory developed.
    3. C.
      The new rules for how the universe works.
    4. D.
      How Fermilab scientists will reanalyze their data.

查看答案和解析>>

阅读理解

  Women don’t talk more than men.Really, they don’t.Women speak 20,000 words a day, compared to the average man’s 7,000.But a study published recently denies this old rule.Both men and women use about 16,000 words a day, says the new research in Science magazine.

  “It’s been a common belief, but it just didn’t fit,” says James Pennebaker, the researcher of the seven-year study.Pennebaker and his colleagues analyzed(分析)recorded conversations of 396 university students age 18 to 29 in the USA and Mexico, including 210 women and 186 men.The study didn’t look at vocabulary or word use, but rather word count.

  Pennebaker says two-thirds of participants spoke 11,000 to 25,000 words a day, with the average for both sexes about 16,000 words.The finding may seem surprising in a popular culture where women are often thought of as talkative and men as silent.

  Most recently, psychiatrist(精神病学家)Louann Brizendine used the 20,000 and 7,000 comparison in her 2006 book The Female Brain, as evidence for brain differences.After the book came out in August, the data was widely reused.“That hits a nerve(神经).It’s been surprising to me that this little point is the point people pick out,” says Brizendine.

  But experts in neurolinguistics(神经语言学)thought that the data was uncertain.Mark Liberman, a linguistics professor at the University of Pennsylvania, says that after Brizendine’s book came out, he tried to find evidence to support her claim, but failed.

(1)

According to the new research in Science magazine, how many words do women use a week?

[  ]

A.

140,000.

B.

47,000.

C.

112,000.

D.

28,000.

(2)

What did Pennebaker and his colleagues focus on in their study?

[  ]

A.

The number of words people used.

B.

The structures people used.

C.

The speed of speaking words.

D.

The use of words.

(3)

We can know the comparison used in The Female Brain was ________.

[  ]

A.

considered untrue by most scientists

B.

accepted as a truth by most scientists

C.

seldom reused by others

D.

considered as evidence for sex brain similarities

(4)

It can be inferred from the passage that at the beginning, Mark Liberman ________.

[  ]

A.

didn’t believe Brizendine’s data in her 2006 book The Female Brain

B.

thought Brizendine’s data in her 2006 book The Female Brain was true

C.

succeeded in finding the evidence to support Brizendine’s claim

D.

cared little about Brizendine’s claim in her 2006 book The Female Brain

查看答案和解析>>


同步练习册答案